No School Left Behind

This week in class, we studied the No Child Left Behind Act. In an education class, I have to admit we went a bit farther in studying this act than in my AP Government class. That is probably why it wasn’t until this week that I realized that this act was not the perfect little guidelines my head perceived it as.

Basically it requires a standardized test be given to all students in public schools. Schools that to not meet constantly increasing standards, risk losing their Title 1 funding in just a few years. During our discussion, I kept thinking “This doesn’t keep kids from being left behind… this could leave kids and schools behind.”

The first thing that stuck out to me was the high stakes testing. I wrote a previous post on teaching to tests rather than teaching to students and I think this act drastically increases this problem. Not only are students pressured to do well on tests, teachers are pressured to make their students do well on tests. If their students don’t do well, this is a result of the teachers teaching. This opens the door to many problems. What if the teachers neglect the slightly above average students? What if the teachers only focus on the test and leave students out other important arenas in the student’s education? What if the teachers ignore the struggling students because of a predetermined notion they can’t do well on the test? My last post talked about the stress and anxiety of testing and the toll it takes on high schoolers; I can’t imagine elementary schoolers would be able to handle it any better.

Another definite problem is the funding. Imagine you are a teacher in a classroom and you had just taught a lesson. The students then individually worked on an assignment assessing their comprehensions of the lesson. Many students are doing great and a couple students are struggling to work through the assignment. Are you going to put extra time and resources into those students already doing well, or those who are struggling? – the students who are struggling.

That’s how I think of taking away Title 1 funding from schools who don’t meet AYP. Those schools are the schools that are struggling, or have students who are, yet these are also the same schools this funding is being removed from. If they are already having trouble, how can they progress or provide the required extra tutoring and education with even less funding than they had before? Now similarly in the case of the students, you don’t want to neglect the schools that do reach AYP just like you wouldn’t neglect the students that grasp this assignment, but money isn’t limitless.

In our class, we went in circles discussing different ways to fund schools: Give more to the schools that don’t meet AYP, give less but still some to those schools, give an equal amount of money to all schools. We never could reach a perfect conclusion (and there may not be one at all), but most of us agreed that this was probably not it.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to No School Left Behind

  1. abbymevans2015 says:

    Wow I really loved the analogy you used in your post. You made it seem as if NCLB and taking away Title 1 funding was senseless (which I totally agree it is) and did so in a simply yet very effective way. Also I liked how you mentioned how we threw out so many options (some realistic and others not) yet we all agreed that NCLB was not effective.


  2. natercole says:

    Your questions that you bring about the No Child Left Behind are great, but I agree, we don’t know any other effective solution.

    Also, I’m not sure if a lack of funding always means a lesser quality education or automatically students’ test scores falling. If I recall correctly, many parochial schools receive very little funding, yet their students excel. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I don’t believe that a school needs a lot of funding to give a child a good and effective education.

    That being said, using funding to bait schools to teach their students to the test is wrong. Like you said, teaching students to the test is wrong. This causes the school to focus on the money they receive rather than the education they deliver.


  3. Casper Rhay says:

    Great post! I feel like it sums up our previous class pretty well. And you can do it! Just don’t lose heart in exploring solutions 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s